<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[SHARE TMD]]></title><description><![CDATA[SHARE TMD]]></description><link>https://www.sharetmd.com/news</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:15:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.sharetmd.com/blog-feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Beware of Unsupported Conclusions About Occlusal Adjustments]]></title><description><![CDATA[Scientific progress depends not only on publishing research but also on critically evaluating whether the conclusions drawn are justified by the methods used. A recent exchange published in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry provides an excellent example of how an interesting clinical observation can generate conclusions that extend beyond what the study design can reliably demonstrate. Ohrbach R, Sharma S, Romero M, Almarza A, Cioffi I, Neubert JK, Drangsholt M. Letter to the Editor...]]></description><link>https://www.sharetmd.com/post/beware-of-unsupported-conclusions-about-occlusal-adjustments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6a4deeb524d6803bed6c222a</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 06:37:38 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/07a65d_a0d91a717905496a9500b361b6cd9343~mv2.png/v1/fit/w_1000,h_1000,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>iacopocioffi7</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>